Wildlife conservation and management in Nagaland

A partial view of Yaongyimchen Community Biodiversity Conserved areas. (Morung File Photo)

A partial view of Yaongyimchen Community Biodiversity Conserved areas. (Morung File Photo)

Our Correspondent
Kohima | January 15

Nagaland has one National Park and three Wildlife Sanctuaries covering 222 Sq.Km which constitutes 1.34% of the state’s geographical area.

“The  existence  of  optimum  number of  wildlife  is  an  appropriate  indicator  of  good  forests and  prosperity. The ecological and food security of a country depends on quality and quantity of its forests,” according to the annual administrative report of environment, forest and climate change Nagaland 2017-18.

The report stated that  the  survival  of  man  is  dependent  on  the  survival  of  animals  and  plant  life.

In  the  state  of Nagaland, where lion’s share of forest resources accounting/measuring 88.3% approximately is under the control of individuals and private communities and the forest department is having very limited regulations and people are hunters since time immemorial, awareness has been created with the sincere efforts of the forest department and  feeling of belongingness in the minds of the people of the state  is inculcated for  forest & wildlife and their protection, the report stated. 

The report stated that results are coming forward and wildlife protection by the people of Nagaland is being realized both in our country as well as in the world. 

In addition to protection of wildlife in private forests, the department is maintaining wildlife in Intanki National Park, Singphan Wildlife Sanctuary, Puliebadze Wildllife Sanctuary and Fakim Wildlife Sanctuary.

In order to increase Protected Area, the State Government had notified the following Community Reserves under section 36(C) of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. Kigwema Community Reserve, D. Khel Kohima Community Reserve, Mezoma Community Reserve, Dihoma Community Reserve, Chishilimi Community Reserve, Khekiye Community Reserve, Lizuto Community Reserve, Atoizu community Reserve, Thsuruhu Community Reserve, Tsekhewelu Community Reserve, Lozaphuhu Community Reserve, Kikruma Community Reserve, Chemekong Community Reserve, Morakjo Community Reserve, Tsiepama Community Reserve, Khrokhropfu Community Reserve, Mopungchuket Community Reserve and Bonchu Community Reserve.
 
Activities of the Wildlife Wing

Keeping in view of the National Wildlife Action Plan (2002-2016), the Wildlife Sector has taken up some major initiatives programmes limited not only to the PAs and other ex-situ conservation centers but  also outside the PAs for protection and conservation of saving critically endangered species and its habitats and initiated specific species/ habitats recovery programmes such as protection and conservation of migratory bird Amur falcon, hoolock gibbon, great Indian hornbill, tragopan bird, protection and management of elephants in the wild and in captivity, etc.

Other programme such as conservation awareness, mitigation human-wildlife conflicts, capacity enhancement activities, eco-development  programmes  under  CSS  are  [Project  Elephant,  Integrated  Development  of  Wildlife  Habitats,  for Protected Areas, Amur Falcons, Human-Animals Conflict, Community Reserves]. 

Breeding of critically endangered species,  housing  of  captive  animals  of  local,  regional  and  national  importance  are  put  at  the  Nagaland  Zoological Park. However, the CSS funding are basically for the habitat manipulation and augmentation of the PA’s resources, i.e., Management of PAs.

The objective of the Wildlife Wing is to provide adequate protection to wildlife in multiple use areas (MUAs) and  recognizing  that  there  are  several  traditional  community-initiated  and  driven  conservation  programme,  and  supporting such areas to ensure coverage to the neglected ecosystems and widening the focus of conservation beyond the frontiers of conventional PAs. A recent encouraging trend seen in Nagaland in the field of wildlife management is the realization of the importance of fauna and flora by various communities in the State. Many villages have taken up conservation initiatives in their community land by declaring their areas as Community Reserves, banning hunting, use of explosives and chemicals for fishing and banning of bush fire and destruction of the forests. The Wildlife Wing is encouraging and supporting such initiatives by the Communities.

Another important achievement is – Safe passage of Amur falcon (Falco amurensis): The State Forest Department with the support of NGOs such as Nagaland Wildlife & Biodiversity Conservation Trust, Natural Nagas, Wildlife Trust  of  India,  the  Administration  and  the  Villagers  (stakeholders)  protected  the  birds  from  mortality  by  adopting protection strategies such as deployment of Forest Armed Protection Force (wildlife) at the site who had carried out patrolling  round  the  clock.  Besides,  the  Department  had  also  taken  up  massive  campaign  of  awareness,  education and sensitization from village to village, Church to Church, door to door and school to school. 

The report stated that the department also organized  marathon  race  for  protection  and  safe  passage  of  the  birds  during  migration.  The Department with the NGOs formed volunteers a “Friends of Amur Falcons” and youth volunteers to assist the Department.

The  Forest  Department,  with  the  help  of  the  stakeholders  has  proven  the  concept  of  Community-based  Wildlife Protection  by  providing  safe  passage  for  Amur  falcon  thereby  Nagaland  becomes  known  as  the  Falcon  Capital  of the World and hence Nagaland is declared as safe haven for these migratory birds Amur falcons. 

UNEP-CMS and Bombay Natural Forest History Society had appreciated the efforts of Forest Department. And for this achievement, the Forest Armed Protection Force (wildlife) received Governor Commendation Certificate for protection of Amur Falcons.

Challenges and Threats to Wildlife Management

•    Habitat Fragmentation due to commercial logging or due to human settlement
•    Poaching for bush meat for commercial and personal
•    Public apathy
•    Carrying capacity
•    Bushfire
•    Shifting cultivation
•    Land holding pattern of the State
•    Unscientific/unplanned development activities from Centrally Sponsored Schemes and no resources from the State Government of Nagaland