Those who voted YES had to say
• Independent of judiciary is the only to provide justice to the people.
• Our Naga society is a civilized society and it needs independent judiciary to maintain it.
• As long as judiciary is under executive, justice is available only for haves and the haves not are deprived.
• No democratic government is complete without independent judiciary
• We the public in general cannot expect justice as long as judiciary is under executive and political control.
• For better society, independent judiciary is indispensable.
• Independent judiciary does in no way affect customary law of the Nagas hence separation is necessary
• Law is supreme and do to justice independent of judiciary is a must.
• Transparency, independent and justice delivery etc are the most important elements for excellent judiciary system in the democratic system.
• Yes, Justice delayed is Justice denied and this is what Nagaland has faced in the past forty odd years because we have a judiciary controlled by the executive. For a true democracy the judiciary must be independent and separated from the executive in Nagaland.
• Yes, judiciary should be separated
• Yes, because it is essential and to change the way of governance.
Those who voted NO had to say
• No, it will dilute our traditional values
• No, separation will only drag more case to the modern day courts, which means people with money, will win most of the time. Traditional is the best and reliable.
