Dimapur, July 29 (MExN): The Naga Students' Federation (NSF) and the Dimapur Naga Students' Union (DNSU) have expressed concerns regarding the nomination of non-local candidates in Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), urging a reconsideration of these decisions to uphold indigenous representation.
In a representation addressed to Chief Minister Neiphiu Rio, the NSF stressed that indigenous representation in ULBs is crucial to ensure that local governance truly reflects the needs and aspirations of the Naga people. “Urban Local Bodies serve as pivotal platforms for local governance, where decisions impacting the day-to-day lives of citizens are made,” the NSF stated.
It emphasized that the inclusion of non-indigenous individuals in reserved categories could dilute the representation of the Naga community and undermine the purpose of these reservations. “Indigenous representation is not merely a matter of presence but of ensuring that the unique identity, culture, and historical context of the Naga people are upheld and preserved,” the NSF added.
The NSF’s stance revolves around preserving Naga identity, culture, and governance. They warned that allowing non-indigenous individuals to occupy positions meant for indigenous representatives could threaten the preservation of their unique cultural and social fabric. “It is crucial that our governance structures reflect our identity and cater to the needs and aspirations of the indigenous Naga populace,” the NSF emphasized. While advocating for the rights of indigenous Nagas, the NSF also acknowledged the principles of inclusivity and equality but stressed that these should not compromise the rights of indigenous populations.
Parallel to these concerns, the DNSU expressed strong disappointment over the nomination of non-locals in the Dimapur Municipal Council. The union highlighted that the Nagaland Municipal Act 2023 was drafted with provisions in accordance with the special provisions of Article 371(A) of the Indian Constitution, which recognizes and respects the unique identity of the Nagas. "Article 371(A) was not merely inserted into the Constitution; it was secured through blood and sacrifices made by our predecessors,” said the DNSU. Aomi. “Article 371(A) is not a decorative clause but a right granted to the Nagas to govern, decide, and protect the well-being of their people.”
The DNSU criticized the nomination process as outlined in Chapter 2, Para 10 (3) of the Nagaland Municipal Act 2023, arguing that it should prioritize individuals with local knowledge and experience. They also expressed frustration over the suspension of the Inner Line Permit (ILP) in Dimapur, which they argue leaves the city vulnerable to illegal immigration and undermines local control. “Dimapur, being the gateway to Nagaland, without the ILP, is akin to a house without a lock, exposing it to extreme vulnerability,” it said.
The DNSU reiterated their strong opposition to the participation of non-Nagas in local governance and vowed to take all necessary measures to prevent this. “We urge all ward representatives to remember that, despite political affiliations, they are elected to represent the people's voice on issues like this,” Kath added. While congratulating the new members of the Dimapur Municipal Council, the DNSU requested that they work collaboratively for the welfare of the people and respect the sentiments of the local populace.
NCD: The Naga Council Dimapur (NCD) also issued a press release advocating that Government nominees in the formation of ULBs in Nagaland should be “Nagas by blood.”
“The reason behind this appeal of NCD is based on the safeguard of Nagas' Right and the Nagas' special status embedded in Article 371(A), in the constitution of India which provides only Nagas themselves to legislate their own laws according to Naga Customary practices in law-making-bodies. The newly framed Acts and Guidelines of Municipal Council and Town Council are subject to Article 371(A),” it stated. “Urban Local Bodies (ULB) are mainly for own self governance and welfare. Therefore, Nagas by blood should be decision-makers in their self-governance. In this regard, the Government should exercise cross-checking of the proposed government nominees to the ULB,” it added.
