New Delhi, April 25 (IANS): The Supreme Court Friday ruled that the seven conspirators in the 1991 Rajiv Gandhi assassination will not be released for now, and blocked the Tamil Nadu government’s move on this. It referred to the constitution bench the larger question whether the government can free a convict whose death sentence has been commuted to life term.
A bench of Chief Justice P.Sathasivam, Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice N.V.Ramana said that “all the interim orders granted earlier will continue” till a final decision is taken by the constitution bench. The court ruling came on the plea of the central government which challenged the Tamil Nadu government’s decision to release the seven convicts whose death sentences were commuted by the apex court into life terms on grounds of inordinate delay in deciding their mercy petitions.
Extending its order restraining the state government from releasing these convicts, the apex court framed several questions to be addressed by the constitution bench. These included whether after commutation of the death sentence into life imprisonment either by the president, governor or the court, the government can go further to grant them remission of sentences and free them.
While framing this question, the court referred to the conflicting positions taken by the central and the Tamil Nadu governments on this issue. Citing this point, Chief Justice Sathasivam said: “The issue of such a nature has been raised for the first time in this court, which has wide ramification in determining the scope of application of power of remission by the executive - both the centre and the state.”
The court also said that the constitution bench will also address which is the appropriate government -- state or the centre, or both -- to exercise this power to suspend or remit sentences under relevant section of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C). The court framed six more questions to be adjudicated, which included whether life imprisonment means imprisonment for the rest of the convict’s life or whether a convict undergoing life imprisonment has a right to claim remission.
Coupled with this, the constitution bench was asked decide whether there could be a special category wherein after commutation of death penalty, such a convict is put beyond the applicability of remission of sentence and would remain behind bars in excess of a life term of 14 years. The constitution bench would also consider whether the “appropriate government” was permitted to exercise the power of remission after it was already exercised by the president, the governor concerned or by this court.
In yet another question, the constitution bench would address whether the central or state government had primacy over the subject matter listed in the concurrent list of the Constitution of India for exercising the power of remission. The bench would also ecide whether suo motu exercise of power for granting remission was permissible, and if so, whether the procedure prescribed (application by the convict) was mandatory or not.
The constitution bench will also consider whether consultation by the state government with the central government under the Cr.P.C. meant concurrence. “All the issues raised in the given case are of utmost critical concern for the whole of the country, as the decision on these issues will determine the procedure for awarding sentences in the criminal justice system,” the court said.
It directed the listing of the central government’s plea before the constitution bench as early as possible - preferably within three months. The apex court Feb 20 blocked the release of the seven convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case and asked the Tamil Nadu government not to go ahead with its decision to release them.
The day after the court commuted the death sentence of the three conspirators - V. Sriharan alias Murugan, A.G. Perarivalan alias Arivu and T. Suthendraraja alias Santhan - to life imprisonment on the grounds of inordinate delay of 11 years in deciding their mercy petitions by the president, the state government Feb 19 decided to grant them remission and release all the seven convicts undergoing jail term. Besides Murugan, Perarivalan and Suthendraraja alias Santhan, the other four who were sought to be released included Jayakumar, Nalini and Ravichandran.
Families of convicts disappointed
CHENNAI, april 25 (PTI): The Supreme Court decision to refer the issue of remission of death sentence of Rajiv Gandhi killers to a Constitution Bench has disappointed family members of the incarcerated who have been waiting for a favourable order for their release.
CHENNAI, april 25 (PTI): The Supreme Court decision to refer the issue of remission of death sentence of Rajiv Gandhi killers to a Constitution Bench has disappointed family members of the incarcerated who have been waiting for a favourable order for their release.
“I don’t know what to say now” was the instant reaction of Arputhammal, mother of G Perarivalan, who has been engaged in a long legal battle to see her son out of jail. The Supreme Court has referred the matter on remission of life imprisonment of seven convicts in Rajiv Gandhi assassination case to a Constitution Bench and said its interim order staying the Tamil Nadu government’s decision to free them will
continue.
“I was eagerly awaiting the verdict today. I thought I will be able to meet you (press) with happiness. We have fought for 23 years”, she told PTI. “I don’t know how long I would have to suffer further”, she said.
